A US impression costs 14× an Argentine one
And the US ranks 26th of 27 countries on D7 ROAS, at 33%. The Netherlands, Norway and Portugal return 122–133% in week one.
What reach, installs, trials and paying users really cost on Meta, and where spend pays back in week one. Built from campaign data of 5K subscription apps across 45 countries.
29 pages of benchmarks. A free PDF, ready to download as soon as the form is sent.
Ready to read
Thanks! The PDF is yours to keep: 29 pages, about 10 MB.
5Start with page 5, the benchmark at a glance. It takes two minutes and shows where your account sits against the median app.
Signal · What you tell Meta to find
Optimizing for Start Trial buys trials for $20.28. Optimizing for Subscribe costs more per trial, yet buys paying users for $42.77 instead of $57.32, and returns 75% of spend in week one instead of 45%.
A preview of the findings
And the US ranks 26th of 27 countries on D7 ROAS, at 33%. The Netherlands, Norway and Portugal return 122–133% in week one.
Meta picks a few winners fast. Testing volume decides how often you find one, not how evenly budget spreads.
But they click 3–4× more, so cost per click stays between $0.44 and $0.67 across every age band.
Inside the report
Every number is the median app, with P25–P75 ranges where the spread matters. Compare your account against the market, line by line.
Get the reportCPM by month, placement, age and gender.
Spend concentration, video vs image, hook rate and frequency.
CPI, cost per trial, cost per paying user and D7 ROAS, iOS vs Android.
Subscribe vs Start Trial vs Purchase, and Advantage+ vs manual.
Seven categories by CPM, D7 ROAS and cost per payer.
CPM and D7 ROAS in 27 markets, mapped into four quadrants.
Yes. Fill in the form and download the PDF straight away. There's no sales call, and you don't need an Adapty account.
29 pages in four parts: auction and audience, creative, installs and subscribers, and countries. It opens with the eight headline benchmarks on one page and closes with five takeaways you can act on.
It covers CPM, CTR, CPC, hook and hold rate, CPI, cost per trial, cost per paying user and D7 ROAS, cut by month, placement, age and gender, creative format, platform, optimization event, app category and country.
Anonymised, aggregated Meta Ads campaign data from 5K subscription apps connected to Adapty, across 45 countries, July–September 2026. April–June is used only for the monthly CPM trend.
Installs are Meta-reported (7-day click + 1-day view). Trials, paying users and revenue come from Adapty's D7 install cohorts for Meta campaigns, so they reflect what actually happened in the app, not what Meta modelled.
Every benchmark is the median app, with P25–P75 ranges where the spread matters. That way one huge advertiser can't skew the number, and you can see whether you sit in the top or bottom quartile.
Ratios such as CTR and CPM use summed spend, impressions and clicks. Thin samples are left out: a cut is shown only when enough apps sit behind it, which is why 27 of the 45 countries make the D7 ROAS ranking.
Gross revenue in the first 7 days after install, divided by spend. It's an early read on payback: trials that convert later and renewals aren't included yet.
Use it to compare campaigns, events and markets against each other, not as your final payback target. A campaign well below 100% in week one can still pay back over a longer window.
No. Data is anonymised and aggregated before analysis, and no app, campaign or ad can be identified from the report.
UA managers, growth leads and founders running Meta Ads for a subscription app who want to know if their costs and returns are normal.
It's most useful when you're setting targets, planning next quarter's budget, choosing an optimization event or deciding which countries to test.
Yes. The report breaks down CPM, CTR and CPI for six placements: Instagram Reels, Stories and Feed, and Facebook Reels, Feed and Stories. It also shows how much of each placement's installs come from views rather than clicks.
Yes. The report compares CPI and installs per 1,000 impressions on each platform, and shows how iOS apps perform against the median app down to cost per paying user and D7 ROAS.
iOS installs are partly modelled by Meta, so treat the iOS install figures as estimates.
No. The benchmarks apply to any subscription app running Meta Ads, whatever your stack. Two pages describe Adapty Attribution and are clearly marked.
Start by placing your own account against the medians and P25–P75 ranges, then fix the biggest gap first. For the how-to side, read our free Meta Ads playbook for subscription apps. It covers creative testing, the signals you send Meta, and scaling spend without hurting payback.
Every quarter. This edition covers Q3 2026.
Benchmark your Meta campaigns against 5K subscription apps.
Get the free report